The other 3 R's
Small Schools Project examines instructional change through relationships, relevance, and rigor
By Mary Beth Lambert
August 2007
Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.
Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.
KEY QUALITIES OF THE 3 R’S IN ADULT LEARNING
Relationships
- Teachers know colleagues so well that learning opportunities can be tailored to the needs of each teacher.
- Teachers model integrity and open-mindedness for their colleagues.
- Teachers trust their colleagues so well that they grant them the moral authority to challenge them.
- Teachers are committed to their own success, as well as that of their peers.
Relevance
- Instruction is inherently meaningful and engages teachers in multiple domains.
- The learning community values and welcomes the diversity of each teacher into the life of the classroom and its community.
- Learning activities develop within each teacher the habits and curiosity associated with lifelong learning.
- Assessments are meaningful to teachers and offer them insights into their own learning.
Rigor
- Instruction is grounded in content that is complex, ambiguous, provocative, and emotionally or personally challenging.
- Teachers are engaged in active participation, exploration, and research.
- Teachers set learning goals for themselves and monitor progress toward academic excellence.
- Teachers develop resilience, flexibility, and confidence by facing academic challenges and temporary classroom setbacks that are opportunities for deeper learning (Karschney & Squires, 2005).
The project
The Small Schools Project, part of the Coalition of Essential Schools Northwest, provides technical assistance to new small high schools and conversion schools.
Resources include school and district coaching, professional development activities for educators and administrators, publications, and the web site, www.smallschoolsproject.org.
At the web site you can also find the study described in this article, entitled “Adult Learning: Turning the Corner to Instructional Change.”
An instructional framework is:
- A construct about teaching and learning that guides decisions inside and outside the classroom;
- An overarching theory of teaching and learning that provides guidelines/key areas of focus for what is important; and
- A guide for practice, not a teaching recipe (Marzolf, 2005).
Qualities of distributed leadership
- Leadership is shared among people in different roles.
- Leadership is situational rather than hierarchical.
- Authority is based upon expertise, rather than formal position (Wallach, Lambert, Copland, & Lowry, 2005).
Professional communities
Professional communities are groups of teachers, teacher leaders, and other professionals working together in redesigned small high schools who:
- Work toward having a collective focus on student and adult learning;
- Share common norms, values, and goals that are evident in their work with each other and in their classroom practice; and
- Have sufficient time and structures available to build collaborative relationships and interdependence (Wallach & Gallucci, 2004).
References
Barth, R. (2006, March). Improving professional practice. Educational Leadership, 63(6), 8-13.
Karschney, K. & Squires, K. (2005). West Valley instructional framework: Rigor, relevance, relationships. Seattle, WA: Small Schools Coaches Collaborative.
Marzolf, E.A. (with Lambert, M.B.). (2005, Winter). Reading the water: Coaching schools through their improvement efforts. Seattle, WA: Small Schools Project.
National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Wagner, T. (2002, November 27). Secondary school change: Meeting the challenge with the three R’s of reinvention. Education Week, 22(13), 30, 40.
Wallach, C. A. & Gallucci, C. (with Copland, M., Lambert, M.B., & Lowry, L.K.). (2004). Elevating the conversation: Building professional community in small high schools. Seattle, WA: Small Schools Project.
Wallach, C.A., Lambert, M.B., Copland, M., & Lowry, L.K. (2005). Distributing leadership: Moving from high school hierarchy to shared responsibility. Seattle, WA: Small Schools Project.
Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2006, March). Examining the teach- ing life. Educational Leadership, 63(6), 26-29.
Recent Issues
APPLYING THE SCIENCE OF LEARNING
April 2026
Cognitive science illuminates how people learn. This issue shows how...
LEARNING WITH AI
February 2026
Generative AI can be a powerful tool for professional learning design and...
WHAT STUDENTS NEED NOW
December 2025
For all students to thrive, we need to understand who they are and what...
LEARNING COMMUNITIES FOR LEADERS
October 2025
Leaders need opportunities to connect, learn, and grow with peers just as...






