Partners In A Common Cause

FOCUS

Partners in a common cause

External evaluators team with practitioners to build data use practices

By Margie Johnson and Stephanie B. Wilkerson

April 2017

Vol. 38 No. 2

For many districts, evaluation is an afterthought to implementing a new initiative. Educators participate in professional learning experiences, apply what they learn to their practice, and then, at some point, school and district staff begin wondering if the initiative is making a difference. Then they scramble for nuggets of data that provide any evidence of effectiveness. There is another way. A partnership between educators in Metro Nashville Public Schools in Tennessee and external evaluators with Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia (REL Appalachia), with funding from the Institute of Education Sciences, used a well-defined process to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of a new data use initiative from its inception. This article highlights how the partnership approached evaluation, the process external evaluators used to build internal evaluation

Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

Stephanie B. Wilkerson ([email protected]) is president of Magnolia Consulting in Charlottesville, Virginia. Margie Johnson ([email protected]) is business intelligence coordinator for Metro Nashville Public Schools in Nashville, Tennessee.

References

Cousins, J.B. (2003). Utilization effect of participatory evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D.L. Stufflebeam, & L.A. Wingate (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 245-265). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.

Hall, G.E. & Hord, S.M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Lipton, L. & Wellman, B. (2012). Got data? Now what? Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

Love, N. (2009). Using data to improve learning for all: A collaborative inquiry approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Love, N., Stiles, K.E., Mundy, S., & DiRanna, K. (2008). The data coach’s guide to improving learning for all students: Unleashing the power of collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Patton, M.Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Wayman, J.C., Wilkerson, S.B., Cho, V., Mandinach, E.B., & Supovitz, J.A. (2016). Guide to using the Teacher Data Use Survey (REL 2017-166) [Survey and guide]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia. Available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/appalachia/pdf/REL_2017166.pdf.

Wilkerson, S.B. & Haden, C. (2014). Effective practices for evaluating STEM out-of-school time programs. Afterschool Matters, 19, 10-19.