Tackling Instructional Mismatch

FOCUS

Tackling instructional mismatch

Targeted, intentional learning can build leaders' content knowledge

By Sarah Quebec Fuentes and Jo Beth Jimerson

Categories: Leadership, Learning designs, School leadership

October 2019

Vol. 40, No. 5

At the heart of effective school leadership are robust instructional leadership practices. An emphasis on instructional leadership is neither new nor simple. We’ve spent the last several years talking with teachers, school leaders, and content experts about how they engage in instructional leadership and the challenges with which they struggle. One takeaway from this work is that much, if not most, of the time, leaders are engaging in their work within a context of instructional mismatch. Most leaders end up working either with teachers in grade levels they did not teach (e.g. a secondary teacher who becomes an elementary school administrator) or with teachers in unfamiliar content areas (e.g. a former mathematics teacher who supervises social studies and English language arts teachers). This was the

Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

Authors

Sarah Quebec Fuentes and Jo Beth Jimerson

Sarah Quebec Fuentes ([email protected]) is associate professor of mathematics education and Jo Beth Jimerson ([email protected]) is associate professor of educational leadership at Texas Christian University.

References

Bauml, M. (2016). Is it cute or does it count? Learning to teach for meaningful social studies in elementary grades. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 40(1), 55-69.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8-21.

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lochmiller, C.R. (2019). Credibility in instructional supervision: A catalyst for differentiated supervision. In M.I. Derrington and J. Brandon (Eds.), Differentiated Teacher Evaluation and Professional Learning (pp. 83-105). Palgrave Studies on Leadership and Learning in Teacher Education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.

Seeley, C.S. (2016). Building a math-positive culture: How to support great math teaching in your school. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.

Stein, M.K. & Nelson, B.S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423-44.