Menu

The Big Money Question

Action research projects give district a clear picture of professional learning's impact

By Learning Forward
Categories: Learning designs, Outcomes, Resources
August 2015
How do you know if the resources you have allocated to support professional learning in your school district are actually improving the quality of teaching and impacting student performance? In an increasingly challenging financial environment, this is important to know. Six years ago, I joined the district administrative team in Maine Township High School District 207, a district with three high schools in the suburbs of Chicago, Illinois. The district was facing a multimillion-dollar deficit, effectively eliminating professional development, which forced us to ask tough questions and reimagine how we might support teachers. First to be evaluated was the district’s longstanding commitment to training teachers in cooperative learning. Six years later, and at no small expense, 250 teachers had moved through at least the introductory

Read the remaining content with membership access. Join or log in below to continue.

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem.

Log In
   

Authors

Barbara Dill-Varga

Barbara Dill-Varga ([email protected]) is assistant superintendent for curriculum and instruction at Maine Township High School District 207 in Park Ridge, Illinois.

How Teacher Action Research Projects Align with Learning Forward's Standards for Professional Learning

StandardHow teacher action research projects align
Learning CommunitiesTeacher action research projects are teacher learning communities that meet frequently to find answers to common questions of importance about their instructional practices. They work together to understand the research about best practices, then design ways to apply and study those practices in their own classrooms. They share, discuss, and analyze classroom data to understand what is and isn’t working. They make adjustments in what is a continuous cycle of collaborative learning.
LeadershipAction research teachers who later move into mentoring roles for novice action researchers form necessary webs of support to sustain the professional learning.
ResourcesTeacher action research projects that focus on questions about district learning initiatives can provide direction on how best to allocate resources for professional learning that will make a difference in teacher quality and impact student achievement.
DataTeacher action research projects make use of all types of data gathered through surveys, classroom observations, and student achievement measures. The analysis of this data drives future decisions about classroom instruction.
Learning DesignsTeacher action research projects model the core attributes of adult learning theory. Teacher experiences include a balance of research theory and practical application. They are given choice and autonomy and are supported to deepen and share their expertise to improve the larger group.
ImplementationTeachers find support by working together and with trained coaches or other experienced action research mentors who help them implement this reflective process.
OutcomesTeacher action research projects build professional skills clearly defined in the Danielson Framework for Effective Teaching.

Sample CLEAR Project action research questions

Construction of groups and implementation of cooperative learning core elements:

  • Does using homogeneous or heterogeneous gender grouping increase student participation and reduce teacher interventions?
  • Do people learn better in two-person or three-person teams?
  • How do different instructional methods of teaching social skills within base groups increase the frequency of that skill outside of base groups?

Student learning: Impact of cooperative learning on student performance:

  • Do cooperative teams demonstrate a performance advantage?
  • Will working with a partner on class activities increase the comprehension of an individual student’s learning?

Classroom environment: Impact on student attitudes and interactions:

  • How does group processing affect student attitudes in the classroom?
  • Does teaching social skills in the classroom increase positive interactions among students and transfer outside of the classroom?
  • How would use of cooperative learning reduce student isolation in the classroom?

References

Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. Available at https://danielsongroup.org/framework.

Sagor, R. (2010). Collaborative action research for professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.


Learning Forward is the only professional association devoted exclusively to those who work in educator professional development. We help our members plan, implement, and measure high-quality professional learning so they can achieve success with their systems, schools, and students.


Categories: Learning designs, Outcomes, Resources

Search
The Learning Professional


Published Date

CURRENT ISSUE


Recent Issues

APPLYING THE SCIENCE OF LEARNING
April 2026

Cognitive science illuminates how people learn. This issue shows how...

LEARNING WITH AI
February 2026

Generative AI can be a powerful tool for professional learning design and...

WHAT STUDENTS NEED NOW
December 2025

For all students to thrive, we need to understand who they are and what...

LEARNING COMMUNITIES FOR LEADERS
October 2025

Leaders need opportunities to connect, learn, and grow with peers just as...

×

Register your interest

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.